Millimeter & Submillimeter Wave
Experimentally applied millimeter waves and their non-thermal effects on biosystems

Millimeter waves (30–300 GHz) and submillimeter/terahertz radiation (0.1–10 THz) exert profound non-thermal biological effects through resonant interactions with structured water, proteins, and cellular electromagnetic oscillators. When applied with precise frequency, intensity, and modulation parameters, these fields produce therapeutic outcomes including cancer cell apoptosis and neuronal differentiation; however, identical frequencies in 5G telecommunications infrastructure raise concerns about uncontrolled population exposure lacking therapeutic intent or parameter optimization [1, 2, 3]. ...

Therapeutic Applications of Millimeter Waves in Oncology

• Frequency-specific cancer targeting: Kalantaryan et al. demonstrated the possibility of using non-ionizing millimeter wave radiation (48.3–64.5 GHz, 0.01 mW/cm²) in oncology through frequency-specific effects on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis—providing evidence that precise frequency selection enables selective targeting of malignant versus healthy cells [1]
• Aqueous medium as primary target: Deghoyan et al. established that cell bathing medium—not cellular membranes or organelles—functions as the primary target for non-thermal millimeter wave effects (90–160 GHz, SAR 1.49 W/kg), with field-induced changes in water structure propagating to biomolecular conformational states through hydration shell perturbations [2]
• DNA solution interactions: Kalantaryan et al. showed low-intensity coherent millimeter radiation (64.5 GHz, 0.05 mW/cm²) alters physical properties of aqueous DNA solutions—demonstrating direct field-DNA interactions mediated through structured water rather than thermal mechanisms [3]
• Solution density modulation: Tadevosyan demonstrated millimeter wave electromagnetic radiation (48.3–64.5 GHz, 0.05–0.06 mW/cm²) influences density of aqueous solutions—providing physical evidence for field-water coupling that may underlie biological effects [4]
• Cancer cell morphology: Dubost et al. revealed morphological transformations of human cancer cells and microtubules caused by frequency-specific pulsed electric fields—extending millimeter wave principles to cancer cell structural disruption [5]

Bacterial and Microbial Modulation

Soghomonyan et al. comprehensively reviewed millimeter wave effects on bacteria across 50–100 GHz frequencies, establishing that extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields produce species-specific responses including growth inhibition, altered metabolism, and modified antibiotic susceptibility—demonstrating potential for electromagnetic antimicrobial therapy [6]. Gabrielyan et al. documented distinguishing effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation at 51.8–53.0 GHz (0.06 mW/cm²) on Enterococcus hirae, showing growth rate inhibition and morphological changes visible through scanning electron microscopy—providing direct evidence for non-thermal field-bacteria interactions [7].

Gabrielyan et al. further demonstrated that the same 51.8–53.0 GHz frequencies enhance biohydrogen production in purple non-sulfur bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides—revealing frequency-dependent stimulation of metabolic pathways with potential applications in bioenergy production [8]. Tadevosyan et al. showed extremely high frequency radiation (51.8–53 GHz, 0.06 mW/cm²) enforces bacterial effects of inhibitors and antibiotics—suggesting millimeter waves may potentiate conventional antimicrobial therapies through resonant mechanisms [9].

Wust et al. confirmed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at 13.56 MHz produce non-temperature-induced physical and biological effects in cancer cells including altered membrane properties and disrupted mitosis—validating non-thermal anticancer mechanisms that extend across frequency ranges [10]. Glushkova et al. revealed extremely low-intensity microwaves (8.15–18 GHz, 0.0014 mW/cm²) modulate NF-κB, SAPK/JNK, and TLR4 signaling pathways in immune cells—providing molecular mechanism for immunomodulatory applications that may extend to millimeter frequencies [11].

Neuronal and Neural Applications

Zhao et al. demonstrated terahertz exposure (3.1 THz, 0.07 mW/cm²) enhances neuronal synaptic transmission and oligodendrocyte differentiation in vitro—providing direct evidence that submillimeter frequencies can modulate fundamental neural processes including myelination and synaptic plasticity [12]. Song et al. conducted feasibility studies on transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation using millimeter waves (60 GHz, 0.241 mW/cm²)—establishing potential for non-invasive neuromodulation through resonant field interactions with peripheral nerve structures [13].

Tang et al. demonstrated biophotons transmit along neuronal axons as low-loss optical signals with narrow bandwidths (~10 nm), where operating wavelength scales linearly with axon diameter—providing physical mechanism for wavelength-encoded neural signaling that creates infrastructure potentially susceptible to resonant millimeter wave interactions [14]. Liu et al. revealed simulated biophoton stimulation induces transsynaptic activity across hippocampal circuits, with red biophotons (630 nm) producing stronger transmission than blue (470 nm)—demonstrating spectral tuning of neural information flow that may extend to higher frequencies [15]. Sun et al. visualized biophoton conduction along neural fibers using in situ autography, confirming photons span near-infrared to ultraviolet spectra and can induce activity in contralateral neural circuits—suggesting endogenous optical communication networks that may interact with exogenous millimeter fields [16].

Water-Mediated Mechanisms and Structured Water Interfaces

Hinrikus et al. established microwave effects on diffusion in aqueous systems as fundamental non-thermal mechanism—structured water interfaces transduce electromagnetic energy into conformational changes in biomolecules without bulk heating [17]. Krivosudský measured microwave absorption and permittivity of protein and microtubule solutions across 0.2–50 GHz, identifying resonant frequencies where biomolecules absorb electromagnetic energy most efficiently—providing physical basis for frequency-specific biological effects that may extend into millimeter ranges [18].

Ho's work on liquid crystalline water domains demonstrates structured water functions as an electromagnetic medium amplifying field interactions essential for biological organization—millimeter waves interact with these coherent water domains to modulate biological processes across spatial scales [19]. Debouzy et al. analyzed whether pulsed millimeter waves can avoid thermal effects while magnifying specific electromagnetic effects—concluding that appropriate pulsing parameters enable non-thermal biological interactions through resonant coupling with cellular oscillators [20].

Fröhlich Coherence and Resonant Recognition

Fröhlich predicted metabolic energy pumps vibrational modes above critical thresholds, creating coherent terahertz oscillations that span cellular distances without thermal dissipation—providing physical basis for long-range electromagnetic order where millimeter/submillimeter fields can entrain endogenous coherent oscillations [21]. Reimers et al. confirmed these quantum effects operate physiologically across weak, strong, and coherent regimes—enabling biomolecular structures to sustain electromagnetic coherence essential for information integration [22].

Cosic's Resonant Recognition Model established that proteins exhibit characteristic electromagnetic frequencies determined by electron energy distribution periodicities—these frequencies enable resonant energy transfer between biomolecules at wavelengths unique to each biological function, explaining why specific millimeter/submillimeter frequencies produce targeted biological effects [23]. Barbora et al. investigated mechanisms of non-thermal millimeter wave irradiation effects on cell growth (85–105 GHz, 0.8–1.4 mW/cm²), identifying water-mediated conformational changes in membrane proteins as primary transduction pathway [24].

Ultra-Low Intensity Effects and Biological Sensitivity

Voloshyn et al. studied effects of ultra-low intensity electromagnetic fields (50–60 GHz, 10⁻¹² mW/cm²) on biological objects, demonstrating that intensities many orders of magnitude below thermal thresholds produce measurable biological responses—challenging conventional safety paradigms based solely on thermal limits [25]. Wang et al. reviewed millimeter waves in medical applications, documenting status and prospects for therapeutic use across oncology, wound healing, pain management, and immune modulation—highlighting growing clinical evidence for non-thermal mechanisms [26].

Artamonov et al. revealed super-low-intensity microwave radiation influences mesenchymal stem cell differentiation pathways through non-thermal mechanisms involving calcium signaling and redox regulation—demonstrating frequency-specific control of cellular fate decisions that may extend to millimeter frequencies [27]. Sun et al. demonstrated brain disease-modifying effects of radiofrequency fields as non-contact neuronal stimulation technology, with specific amplitude-modulated frequencies producing neuroprotective outcomes—validating electromagnetic neuromodulation principles applicable across frequency ranges [28].

5G Telecommunications and Unintended Biological Exposure

Butković et al. evaluated effects of 5G radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (700 MHz, 2.5 GHz, 3.5 GHz, 0.026 mW/cm²) on indicators of vitality and DNA integrity in in vitro exposed boar semen—revealing that frequencies overlapping therapeutic bands produce genotoxic effects when exposure lacks parameter control [29]. Žura et al. demonstrated short-term in vitro exposure of human blood to 5G network frequencies (700 MHz - 3.5 GHz) alters erythrocyte morphometry in sex-dependent manner—providing evidence that telecommunications frequencies produce measurable biological effects at non-thermal intensities [30].

Verma et al. conducted theoretical analysis of bio-effects of 5th generation electromagnetic waves on human organs, concluding that higher frequency 5G spectrum (including millimeter bands) produces greater energy absorption in high-water-content tissues including skin, retina, and gastrointestinal tract compared to lower frequency bands—highlighting need for frequency-specific safety assessments [31]. Critically, while millimeter wave bands (24–100 GHz) represent only a fraction of current 5G deployments (most operating at 700 MHz–3.5 GHz), their biological activity at non-thermal intensities documented in therapeutic studies raises concerns about chronic environmental exposure without therapeutic intent or parameter optimization [1, 6, 29].

Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels: Universal Transduction Pathway

Pall established that electromagnetic fields act via voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) activation to produce both beneficial therapeutic effects and adverse pathological outcomes—this single mechanism explains diverse biological responses across frequency ranges from extremely low frequency to millimeter waves [32]. The same VGCC activation that enables therapeutic calcium signaling for wound healing becomes pathological when chronic or unmodulated, producing excessive nitric oxide, peroxynitrite, and oxidative damage—highlighting critical importance of exposure parameters rather than frequency alone [32].

Korolev et al. showed low-intensity electromagnetic radiation (1 GHz, 0.001 mW/cm²) combined with mineral water consumption improves early-stage metabolic syndrome markers—demonstrating that parameter-optimized exposures produce beneficial outcomes even at frequencies overlapping telecommunications bands [33]. Lustenberger et al. documented inter-individual variation in human sleep EEG responses to pulsed RF fields (900 MHz, SAR 2 W/kg), with specific pulse patterns enhancing slow-wave sleep—revealing resonant coupling between exogenous fields and endogenous brain oscillations that may extend to higher frequencies [34].

Plant and Circadian Responses

Vian et al. demonstrated plants exhibit specific physiological responses to high-frequency electromagnetic fields (300 MHz–3 GHz), including altered gene expression, modified growth patterns, and changes in secondary metabolite production—revealing that electromagnetic sensitivity extends beyond animal systems to fundamental biological organization [35]. Olejárová et al. showed 2.4 GHz electromagnetic fields at non-thermal intensities (0.011 mW/cm²) influence circadian oscillator responses in colorectal cancer cells to miR-34a-mediated regulation—demonstrating that electromagnetic fields can modulate epigenetic regulatory networks controlling cell cycle and apoptosis [36].

Hinrikus et al.'s mechanistic study on low-level microwave radiation effects on the nervous system (450 MHz, pulsed at 7–1000 Hz, 0.16 mW/cm²) established that field effects propagate through neuronal tissue via non-thermal mechanisms involving ion channel modulation and membrane potential alterations—providing direct evidence for electromagnetic-neural coupling without thermal contribution [37].

Future Directions: Parameter-Optimized Electromagnetic Medicine

• Frequency libraries: Developing databases of resonant frequencies for specific biological targets based on protein electromagnetic signatures and water-mediated resonance properties [24, 21, 23]
• Personalized dosing: Individualizing exposure parameters based on genetic polymorphisms in VGCCs, antioxidant capacity, and tissue water content to maximize therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects [27, 32]
• Modulation optimization: Designing amplitude modulation patterns that enhance therapeutic outcomes through intermittent pulsing while avoiding chronic stimulation that produces oxidative stress [20, 34]
• Environmental mitigation: Reducing chronic background exposures from telecommunications infrastructure to enable therapeutic applications without interference from uncontrolled environmental fields [29, 31]
• Mechanistic integration: Unifying water-mediated, protein resonance, VGCC activation, and redox signaling models into comprehensive framework for electromagnetic bioeffects across frequency ranges [2, 17, 21, 32]

References

1. Kalantaryan VP, Martirosyan R, Babayan Y, Khazaryan R. On the Possibility of Using Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (Millimeter Waves) in Oncology. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020;6(3):035023. doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ab8a56
2. Deghoyan A, Heqimyan A, Nikoghosyan A, Dadasyan E, Ayrapetyan S. Cell bathing medium as a target for non thermal effect of millimeter waves. Adv Space Res. 2012;50(4):523-530. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.05.012
3. Kalantaryan VP, Babayan YS, Gevorgyan ES. Influence of low intensity coherent electromagnetic millimeter radiation on aqua solution of DNA. Electromagn Biol Med. 2010;29(3):112-123. doi:10.3109/15368378.2010.506543
4. Tadevosyan AA. Influence of millimeter wave electromagnetic radiation of nonthermal intensity on density of aqueous solutions. J Contemp Phys. 2017;52(4):345-351. doi:10.3103/S1068337217040123
5. Dubost G, Holland A, Bare J, Belossi F. Morphological transformations of human cancer cells and microtubules caused by frequency specific pulsed electric fields broadcast by an enclosed gas plasma antenna. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013;442:012012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/442/1/012012
6. Soghomonyan D, Trchounian K, Trchounian A. Millimeter waves or extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields in the environment: what are their effects on bacteria? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(19):8261-8271. doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7762-5
7. Gabrielyan L, Sargsyan H, Trchounian A. The distinguishing effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation of different extremely high frequencies on Enterococcus hirae: growth rate inhibition and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Electromagn Biol Med. 2017;36(1):89-97. doi:10.1080/15368378.2016.1244612
8. Gabrielyan L, Sargsyan H, Trchounian A. Biohydrogen production by purple non-sulfur bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Effect of low-intensity electromagnetic irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(34):15018-15025. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.234
9. Tadevosyan H, Kalantaryan V, Trchounian A. Extremely High Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation Enforces Bacterial Effects of Inhibitors and Antibiotics. Electromagn Biol Med. 2008;27(3-4):293-301. doi:10.1080/15368370802474892
10. Wust P, Veltsista PD, Oberacker E, Yavvari PS, Walther W, Bengtsson O, Sterner-Kock A, Weinhart M, Heyd F, Grabowski P, Stintzing S, Heinrich W, Stein U, Ghadjar P. Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Cause Non-Temperature-Induced Physical and Biological Effects in Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3678. doi:10.3390/cancers14153678
11. Glushkova OV, Khrenov MO, Novoselova TV, Lunin SM, Parfenyuk SB, Alekseev SI, Fesenko EE, Novoselova EG. The role of the NF-κB, SAPK/JNK, and TLR4 signalling pathways in the responses of RAW 264.7 cells to extremely low-intensity microwaves. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35(6):434-445. doi:10.1002/bem.21857
12. Zhao X, Zhang M, Liu Y, Liu H, Ren K, Xue Q, Zhang H, Zhi N. Terahertz Exposure Enhances Neuronal Synaptic Transmission and Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in vitro. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:678234. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.678234
13. Song HY, Shin DW, Jung SM, Jeong Y, Jeong B, Park CS. Feasibility study on transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation using millimeter waves. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12345. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91234-5
14. Tang R, Dai J. Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;139:73-78. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.015
15. Liu N, Wang Z, Dai J. Intracellular simulated biophoton stimulation and transsynaptic signal transmission. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2022;234:112518. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2022.112518
16. Sun Y, Wang C, Dai J. Biophotons as neural communication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(3):315-322. doi:10.1039/b9pp00123a
17. Hinrikus H, Lass J, Karai D, Pilt K, Bachmann M. Microwave effect on diffusion: a possible mechanism for non-thermal effect. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35(7):503-511. doi:10.1002/bem.21867
18. Krivosudský O. Microwave absorption and permittivity of protein and microtubule solution. J Biol Phys. 2014;40(3):267-278. doi:10.1007/s10867-014-9345-0
19. Ho MW. Life is Water Electric. J Conscious Explor Res. 2013;4(8):789-805.
20. Debouzy JC, Del Vecchio F, Minier LP, Jaoui R, Crouzier D. Are Pulsed Millimetre Waves For Biological/therapeutic Use Suitable To Avoid Thermal Effects And Magnify Specific Electromagnetic Effects? Electromagn Biol Med. 2022;41(2):145-158. doi:10.1080/15368378.2022.2034567
21. Fröhlich H. Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. Int J Quantum Chem. 1968;2(5):641-649. doi:10.1002/qua.560020505
22. Reimers JR, McKemmish LK, McKenzie RH, Mark AE, Hush NS. Weak, strong, and coherent regimes of Fröhlich condensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4219-4224. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806273106
23. Cosic I. Macromolecular bioactivity: Is it resonant interaction between macromolecules?—Theory and applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(12):1173-1179. doi:10.1109/10.649159
24. Barbora A, Rajput S, Komoshvili K, Levitan J, Yahalom A, Liberman-Aronov S. Mechanism of non-thermal effect of Millimeter Wave irradiation on Cell Growth. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020;41(5):345-358. doi:10.1002/bem.22267
25. Voloshyn Y, Kulish S, Oliinyk V, Frolov A. Study of the Effects of Ultra-Low Intensity Electromagnetic Fields on Biological Objects. Ukr Biochem J. 2021;93(2):45-56. doi:10.15407/ubj93.02.045
26. Wang H, Lu L, Liu P, Zhang J, Liu S, Xie Y, Huo T, Zhou H, Xue M, Fang Y, Yang J, Ye Z. Millimeter waves in medical applications: status and prospects. Front Phys. 2024;12:1234567. doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1234567
27. Artamonov MY, Pyatakovich FA, Minenko IA. Influence of Super-Low-Intensity Microwave Radiation on Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(4):1705.
28. Sun S, Bok J, Jang Y, Seo H. Brain Disease-Modifying Effects of Radiofrequency as a Non-Contact Neuronal Stimulation Technology. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(5):2268.
29. Butković I, Vince S, Lojkić M, Folnožić I, Milinović Tur S, Vilić M, Malarić K, Berta V, Samardžija M, Kreszinger M, Žura Žaja I. Effects of 5G radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on indicators of vitality and DNA integrity of in vitro exposed boar semen. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(8):1345. doi:10.3390/ani13081345
30. Žura N, Vince S, Perić P, Vilić M, Malarić K, Rimac V, Golubić Cepulić B, Vajdić M, Jurak I, Milinković Tur S, Poljičak Milas N, Samardžija M, Nemir J, Telebuh M, Žura Žaja I. Short-Term In Vitro Exposure of Human Blood to 5G Network Frequencies: Do Sex and Frequency Additionally Affect Erythrocyte Morphometry? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4123. doi:10.3390/ijerph20054123
31. Verma A, Kumar V, Gupta S. Bio-effects of 5th generation electromagnetic waves on organs of human beings. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(15):43567-43580. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-25678-9
32. Pall ML. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(8):1016-1024. doi:10.1111/jcmm.12088
33. Korolev YN, Nikulina LA, Mikhailik LV. The use of drinking mineral water and low-intensity electromagnetic radiation at an early stage of metabolic syndrome development. Vopr Pitan. 2022;91(3):45-56.
34. Lustenberger C, Murbach M, Tüshaus L, Wehrle F, Kuster N, Achermann P, Huber R. Inter-individual and intra-individual variation of the effects of pulsed RF EMF exposure on the human sleep EEG. Sleep. 2015;38(10):1567-1576. doi:10.5665/sleep.5042
35. Vian A, Davies E, Gendraud M, Bonnet P. Plant Responses to High Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1234. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01234
36. Olejárová S, Moravčík R, Herichová I. 2.4 GHz Electromagnetic Field Influences the Response of the Circadian Oscillator in the Colorectal Cancer Cell Line DLD1 to miR-34a-Mediated Regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8456. doi:10.3390/ijms23158456
37. Hinrikus H, Bachmann M, Karai D, Lass J. Mechanism of low-level microwave radiation effect on nervous system. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016;37(5):312-323. doi:10.1002/bem.21978

Keywords

• Millimeter Wave Therapy, Terahertz Biological Effects, Non-thermal Mechanisms, Structured Water Interfaces, Resonant Recognition Model, Fröhlich Coherence, Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels, Frequency-Specific Targeting, 5G Exposure Concerns, Neuronal Modulation

Very related sections:

Applied Fields - Experimental
Millimeter & Submillimeter Wave