Light - Various
A variety of light wavelengths have different targets, pathways and therapeutic possibilities

Exogenously applied light exerts profound biological effects not as an artificial intervention but by engaging pre-existing phototransduction mechanisms that evolved to process endogenous biophoton emissions—organisms utilize light as a fundamental information carrier across evolutionary timescales, with exogenous photobiomodulation functioning as a resonant extension of the endogenous electromagnetic signaling architecture that orchestrates cellular organization, tissue repair, and neural computation [1, 2, 3]. ...

Endogenous Phototransduction: The Biological Basis for Light Sensitivity

• Biophotons as evolutionary precursors: Popp established that biophotons exhibit coherence properties essential for biological regulation, with DNA functioning as both source and storage medium for these ultraweak photon emissions—creating an endogenous optical communication layer that predates specialized photoreceptors [1]. Van Wijk and Van Wijk's diagnostic progress review demonstrates biophoton detection has broad applications in non-invasive assessment of physiological states, confirming light as a fundamental biological information channel [2]
• Neural biophoton networks: Tang and Dai demonstrated biophotons transmit along neuronal axons as low-loss optical signals with narrow bandwidths (~10 nm), where operating wavelength scales linearly with axon diameter—providing physical mechanism for wavelength-encoded neural signaling that creates a pre-existing infrastructure for exogenous light interactions [3]. Sun, Wang and Dai visualized biophoton conduction along neural fibers using in situ autography, confirming photons span near-infrared to ultraviolet spectra and can induce activity in contralateral neural circuits [4]
• Visual system co-option: Bókkon's biophysical picture representation model proposes visual perception involves conversion of external light into biophotons within retinotopic neurons, with retinal electrical impulses conveyed to V1 area where mitochondrial redox processes convert them again to photonic signals—demonstrating that neural systems evolved to transduce external light precisely because they already utilized endogenous biophotons for internal communication [5]
• Structured water amplification: Ho's work on liquid crystalline water domains and Pollack's discovery of exclusion zone (EZ) water reveal coherent domains extending from hydrophilic surfaces that absorb specific wavelengths while emitting fluorescence—positioning structured water as an active biophoton source, amplifier, and transducer that creates wavelength-selective sensitivity across all tissues [6, 7]

Cytochrome c Oxidase: The Primary Photoacceptor Bridging Endogenous and Exogenous Light

Karu's foundational research established cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) in the mitochondrial respiratory chain as the primary photoacceptor for red and near-infrared radiation, with absorption peaks at 600-700 nm and 760-940 nm corresponding to copper centers and heme groups within the enzyme complex [8, 9]. Crucially, CCO functions not merely as a metabolic enzyme but as an electromagnetic transducer that evolved to respond to endogenous photon emissions from neighboring mitochondria and cellular structures—exogenous photobiomodulation simply amplifies this pre-existing signaling pathway [8, 10].

Karu, Pyatibrat, Kolyakov and Afanasyeva's absorption measurements of cell monolayers in the visible spectral range confirmed CCO serves as a marker of mitochondrial function whose photoactivation triggers cascades including increased ATP production, modulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and activation of transcription factors regulating cell proliferation and survival [11]. Karu, Pyatibrat and Kalendo demonstrated that photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins through CCO-mediated mechanisms—proving light sensitivity exists even in non-visual neural tissues that never evolved specialized photoreceptors [10].

Wong-Riley, Liang, Eells, Chance, Henry, Buchmann, Kane and Whelan confirmed these mechanisms in primary neurons, showing near-infrared light therapy rescues neurons from metabolic toxins by restoring mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP synthesis through CCO photoactivation [12]. Eells, Wong-Riley, VerHoeve, Henry, Buchman, Kane, Gould, Das, Jett, Hodgson, Margolis and Whelan demonstrated mitochondrial signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing, establishing that CCO-mediated phototransduction operates across diverse tissue types as a universal regulatory mechanism [13].

Resonant Recognition Model: Frequency-Specific Biological Effects

Cosic's Resonant Recognition Model (RRM) establishes that proteins and DNA exhibit characteristic electromagnetic frequencies determined by periodicities in their electron energy distributions—these frequencies enable resonant energy transfer between interacting biomolecules at wavelengths unique to each biological function [14]. Cosic and Pirogova demonstrated that electromagnetic field interactions contribute to understanding protein and DNA functions through resonant mechanisms that operate across the electromagnetic spectrum [15].

Cosic, Cosic and Lazar predicted electromagnetic resonant frequencies that can trigger specific biological processes, with experimental validation showing activation of L-lactate dehydrogenase, DNA-protein interactions at distance, and photon emission patterns from dying melanoma cells all follow RRM-predicted frequencies [16, 17]. Murugan's work on the emission and application of patterned electromagnetic energy on biological systems demonstrates that once a biological frequency is identified, applying that frequency can either mimic or interfere with particular biological activity—providing theoretical foundation for frequency-specific photobiomodulation [18].

This resonant framework explains why exogenous light at specific wavelengths produces targeted biological effects: organisms evolved to utilize endogenous biophoton emissions at characteristic frequencies for intracellular and intercellular communication, creating selective sensitivity to exogenous light matching those resonant frequencies [14, 1].

Therapeutic Applications: Neurological and Cognitive Enhancement

• Transcranial photobiomodulation: Hennessy and Hamblin established photobiomodulation as a new paradigm for brain therapy, with transcranial light penetrating skull to reach cortical tissue and modulate neural activity through mitochondrial mechanisms [19]. Saltmarche, Naeser, Ho, Hamblin and Lim demonstrated significant improvement in cognition in mild to moderately severe dementia cases treated with transcranial plus intranasal photobiomodulation, with effects persisting months after treatment cessation [20]
• Neurodegenerative disease: De Taboada, Yu, El-Amouri, Dai, Huang, Guffey, Oron, Oron and Hamblin showed transcranial laser therapy attenuates amyloid-β peptide neuropathology in amyloid-β protein precursor transgenic mice—suggesting photobiomodulation may modify disease progression through mechanisms engaging endogenous electromagnetic regulation of protein folding [21]. Johnstone, Spana, Purushothuman, Stone, Mitrofanis and Johnstone explored transcranial photobiomodulation for Parkinson's disease treatment, with Zhang, Song, Figueiredo, Dusse, Liberman, Abouzid and Hamblin confirming photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins in Parkinson's disease models [22, 23]
• Traumatic brain injury: Xuan, Vatansever, Huang and Hamblin demonstrated transcranial low-level laser therapy improves neurological performance in traumatic brain injury in mice through mechanisms including reduced inflammation, enhanced ATP production, and modulation of apoptotic pathways—all processes regulated by endogenous electromagnetic signaling [24]
• Memory and cognition: Rojas and Gonzalez-Lima showed low-level light therapy mitigates redox imbalance and improves memory retention in a mouse model of dementia, with effects mediated through cytochrome c oxidase photoactivation and subsequent enhancement of mitochondrial function [25]

Cellular and Tissue Regeneration Mechanisms

Chung, Dai, Sharma, Huang, Carroll and Hamblin provided comprehensive analysis of low-level laser therapy mechanisms, establishing the "nuts and bolts" of photobiomodulation including primary photoacceptors, signaling pathways, and downstream effects on gene expression [26]. Avci, Gupta, Sadasivam, Vecchio, Pam, Pam and Hamblin reviewed how low-level laser therapy stimulates, heals, and restores skin through mechanisms engaging endogenous repair pathways normally activated by biophoton-mediated signaling during wound healing [27].

Anders, Lanzafame and Arany clarified terminology distinguishing low-level light/laser therapy from photobiomodulation therapy while emphasizing the fundamental principle that light functions as an information carrier rather than thermal agent [28]. Huang, Sharma, Carroll and Hamblin updated understanding of the biphasic dose response in low-level light therapy—demonstrating that optimal effects occur at specific fluences reflecting the nonlinear dynamics of endogenous electromagnetic signaling systems [29].

Liebert, Bicknell, Johnstone, Gordon, Kiat and Hamblin introduced the concept of "photobiomics"—how light, including photobiomodulation, can alter the microbiome through mechanisms engaging endogenous electromagnetic communication between host cells and microbial communities [30]. This extends the principle that light sensitivity operates across biological scales from intracellular to ecosystem levels.

Wavelength-Specific Effects and Spectral Windows

Hamblin's comprehensive review of anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation established that different wavelengths produce distinct biological outcomes based on tissue penetration depth and photoacceptor absorption spectra—red light (630-700 nm) penetrates superficially while near-infrared (800-1100 nm) reaches deeper tissues, with each wavelength engaging pre-existing electromagnetic signaling pathways tuned to those spectral ranges [31].

Wang, Huang, Wang, Lyu and Hamblin demonstrated that red (660 nm) or near-infrared (810 nm) photobiomodulation stimulates proliferation in human adipose-derived stem cells, while blue (415 nm) and green (525 nm) light inhibits proliferation—revealing wavelength-dependent effects that mirror endogenous biophoton emission patterns where different cellular states emit characteristic spectra [32]. Gkotsi, Eleftheriadou, Panteli, Poulios, Kontadakis, Samaras, Kotsabasis demonstrated blue LED light induces photosynthesis gene expression and enhances growth in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, showing even non-photosynthetic organisms retain wavelength-specific light sensitivity reflecting evolutionary conservation of electromagnetic information processing [33].

Mester, Spiry, Szende and Tota's pioneering 1967 study showing laser rays stimulate hair growth in mice initiated the field of photobiomodulation—demonstrating that light effects operate through non-thermal mechanisms engaging endogenous regulatory systems rather than simple energy deposition [34].

Fröhlich Coherence and Multi-Scale Integration

Fröhlich's theoretical framework predicts metabolic energy pumps vibrational modes above critical thresholds, creating coherent terahertz oscillations that span cellular distances without thermal dissipation—providing physical basis for long-range electromagnetic order where exogenous light can entrain endogenous coherent oscillations [35]. Reimers, McKemmish, McKenzie, Mark and Hush confirmed these quantum effects operate physiologically across weak, strong, and coherent regimes, enabling biomolecular structures to sustain electromagnetic coherence essential for information integration [36].

Niggli established ultraweak electromagnetic wavelength radiation as biophoton signals that actively regulate life processes through frequency-specific interactions—positioning exogenous photobiomodulation as an extension of this endogenous regulatory architecture where applied light frequencies engage pre-existing electromagnetic control systems [37].

Therapeutic Implications and Future Directions

• Personalized photomedicine: Understanding individual variations in endogenous biophoton emission patterns may enable personalized photobiomodulation protocols tuned to patient-specific electromagnetic signatures [1, 2]
• Frequency optimization: Resonant Recognition Model predictions can guide selection of optimal wavelengths for specific therapeutic targets, moving beyond trial-and-error to mechanism-based frequency selection [14, 18]
• Combination therapies: Photobiomodulation combined with other electromagnetic interventions (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation) may produce synergistic effects by engaging multiple layers of the endogenous electromagnetic regulatory architecture [31, 19]
• Preventive applications: Regular low-dose photobiomodulation may maintain electromagnetic coherence in aging tissues, preventing the loss of endogenous field organization associated with age-related decline [20, 21]
• Evolutionary perspective: Recognizing photobiomodulation as engagement of pre-existing phototransduction pathways reframes light therapy not as artificial intervention but as restoration of electromagnetic signaling compromised by modern environments lacking natural light spectra [5, 6]

References

1. Popp FA. Properties of biophotons and their theoretical implications. En: Biophotons. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003:173-186.
2. Van Wijk R, Van Wijk EPA. Biophotons in Diagnostics Progress and Expectations. 2010.
3. Tang R, Dai J. Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;139:73-78. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.015
4. Sun Y, Wang C, Dai J. Biophotons as neural communication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(3):315-322. doi:10.1039/b9pp00123a
5. Bókkon I, Salari V, Tuszynski JA, Antal I. Estimation of the number of biophotons involved in the visual perception of a single object image. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2010;100(3):160-167. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.03.014
6. Ho MW. Life is Water Electric. J Conscious Explor Res. 2013;4(8):789-805.
7. Pollack GH. The Fourth Phase of Water: Beyond Solid, Liquid, and Vapor. Seattle: Ebner and Sons; 2013.
8. Karu TI. Mitochondrial signaling in mammalian cells activated by red and near-IR radiation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008;26(4):389-398. doi:10.1089/pho.2008.2269
9. Karu TI. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1999;49(1):1-17. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00219-X
10. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Kalendo GS. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c oxidase. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22(6):495-502. doi:10.1089/pho.2004.22.495
11. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Kolyakov SF, Afanasyeva NI. Absorption measurements of cell monolayers in the visible spectral range: cytochrome c oxidase as a marker of mitochondrial function. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(5):459-466. doi:10.1089/pho.2005.23.459
12. Wong-Riley MT, Liang HL, Eells JT, Chance B, Henry MM, Buchmann EV, Kane MP, Whelan HT. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(6):4761-4771. doi:10.1074/jbc.M409688200
13. Eells JT, Wong-Riley MT, VerHoeve J, Henry M, Buchman EV, Kane MP, Gould LJ, Das R, Jett M, Hodgson BD, Margolis D, Whelan HT. Mitochondrial signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing by near-infrared light therapy. Mitochondrion. 2004;4(5-6):559-567. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.033
14. Cosic I. Macromolecular bioactivity: Is it resonant interaction between macromolecules?—Theory and applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(12):1173-1179. doi:10.1109/10.649159
15. Cosic I, Pirogova E. Can EMF interactions contribute to the understanding of protein and DNA functions? Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(4):281-292. doi:10.1080/15368370701744520
16. Cosic I, Cosic D, Lazar K. Is it possible to predict electromagnetic resonant frequencies that can trigger specific biological processes? Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):2028. doi:10.3390/ijms17122028
17. Cosic I, Cosic D, Lazar K. Photons emitted by dying melanoma cells can kill other melanoma cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;822:45-52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07320-0_6
18. Murugan NJ. The Emission and Application of Patterned Electromagnetic Energy on Biological Systems. 2017. (Doctoral dissertation, Laurentian University of Sudbury).
19. Hennessy M, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation and the brain: a new paradigm. J Neurol. 2017;264(1):1-12. doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8289-5
20. Saltmarche HB, Naeser MA, Ho KF, Hamblin MR, Lim L. Significant improvement in cognition in mild to moderately severe dementia cases treated with transcranial plus intranasal photobiomodulation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):865-878. doi:10.3233/JAD-170134
21. De Taboada L, Yu J, El-Amouri SS, Dai T, Huang YY, Guffey JS, Oron U, Oron A, Hamblin MR. Transcranial laser therapy attenuates amyloid-β peptide neuropathology in amyloid-β protein precursor transgenic mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;24(1):107-118. doi:10.3233/JAD-2010-101548
22. Johnstone DM, Spana S, Purushothuman S, Stone JR, Mitrofanis J, Johnstone J. Exploring the use of transcranial photobiomodulation for treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(4):563-575. doi:10.3233/JPD-140425
23. Zhang Y, Song S, Figueiredo LC, Dusse A, Liberman A, Abouzid K, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins for Parkinson's disease models. Neurophotonics. 2019;6(3):035008. doi:10.1117/1.NPh.6.3.035008
24. Xuan W, Vatansever F, Huang L, Hamblin MR. Transcranial low-level laser therapy improves neurological performance in traumatic brain injury in mice. J Biophotonics. 2013;6(8):613-623. doi:10.1002/jbio.201200203
25. Rojas JC, Gonzalez-Lima F. Low-level light therapy mitigates redox imbalance and improves memory retention in a mouse model of dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(1):269-279. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.04.015
26. Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The Nuts and Bolts of Low-level Laser (Light) Therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516-533. doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7
27. Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013;32(1):41-52. doi:10.12788/j.sder.2013.004
28. Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ, Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(4):183-184. doi:10.1089/pho.2015.9875
29. Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy – an update. Dose Response. 2016;14(4):1559325816684630. doi:10.1177/1559325816684630
30. Liebert A, Bicknell B, Johnstone DM, Gordon LC, Kiat H, Hamblin MR. 'Photobiomics': Can Light, Including Photobiomodulation, Alter the Microbiome? Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(10):613-620. doi:10.1089/photob.2019.4628
31. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophys. 2017;4(3):337-361. doi:10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337
32. Wang Y, Huang YY, Wang Y, Lyu P, Hamblin MR. Red (660 nm) or near-infrared (810 nm) photobiomodulation stimulates, while blue (415 nm), green (525 nm) light inhibits proliferation in human adipose-derived stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7867. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08147-y
33. Gkotsi D, Eleftheriadou E, Panteli VT, Poulios I, Kontadakis C, Samaras T, Kotsabasis K. Blue LED light induces photosynthesis gene expression and enhances growth of C. reinhardtii. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;141:234-241. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.10.012
34. Mester E, Spiry T, Szende B, Tota JG. Effect of laser rays on the growth of hair in mice. Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung. 1967;8(4):339-343.
35. Fröhlich H. Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. Int J Quantum Chem. 1968;2(5):641-649. doi:10.1002/qua.560020505
36. Reimers JR, McKemmish LK, McKenzie RH, Mark AE, Hush NS. Weak, strong, and coherent regimes of Fröhlich condensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4219-4224. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806273106
37. Niggli HJ. Ultraweak Electromagnetic Wavelength Radiation as Biophoton Signals to Regulate Life Processes. Indian J Exp Biol. 2014;52(3):233-240. PMID: 24749269

Keywords

• Photobiomodulation Therapy, Endogenous Biophotons, Cytochrome c Oxidase, Resonant Recognition Model, Mitochondrial Phototransduction, Wavelength-Specific Effects, Fröhlich Coherence, Neural Biophoton Networks, Structured Water Interfaces, Electromagnetic Signaling, Frequency-Specific Modulation

Very related sections:

Applied Fields - Experimental
Light - Various